CHAPTER. VII. |
|
Of Political or Civil Society. |
|
|
|
Sec. 77. GOD
having made man such a creature,
that in his own judgment, it was not good for him to be alone, put him under strong
obligations of necessity, convenience, and inclination to drive him into society, as well
as fitted him with understanding and language to continue and enjoy it. The first society
was between man and wife, which gave beginning to that between parents and children; to
which, in time, that between master and servant came to be added: and though all these
might, and commonly did meet together, and make up but one family, wherein the master or
mistress of it had some sort of rule proper to a family; each of these, or all together,
came short of political society, as we shall see, if we consider the different ends, ties,
and bounds of each of these.
|
|
Sec. 78. Conjugal society is made by a voluntary compact
between man and woman; and tho' it consist chiefly in such a communion and right in one
another's bodies as is necessary to its chief end, procreation; yet it draws with it
mutual support and assistance, and a communion of interests too, as necessary not only to
unite their care and affection, but also necessary to their common off-spring, who have a
right to be nourished, and maintained by them, till they are able to provide for
themselves.
|
|
Sec. 79. For the end of conjunction, between male and
female, being not barely procreation, but the continuation of the species; this
conjunction betwixt male and female ought to last, even after procreation, so long as is
necessary to the nourishment and support of the young ones, who are to be sustained even
after procreation, so long as is necessary to the nourishment and support of the young
ones, who are to be sustained by those that got them, till they are able to shift and
provide for themselves. This rule, which the infinite wise maker hath set to the works of
his hands, we find the inferior creatures steadily obey. In those viviparous animals which
feed on grass, the conjunction between male and female lasts no longer than the very act
of copulation; because the teat of the dam being sufficient to nourish the young, till it
be able to feed on grass, the male only begets, but concerns not himself for the female or
young, to whose sustenance he can contribute nothing. But in beasts of prey the
conjunction lasts longer: because the dam not being able well to subsist herself, and
nourish her numerous off-spring by her own prey alone, a more laborious, as well as more
dangerous way of living, than by feeding on grass, the assistance of the male is necessary
to the maintenance of their common family, which cannot subsist till they are able to prey
for themselves, but by the joint care of male and female. The same is to be observed in
all birds, (except some domestic ones, where plenty of food excuses the cock from feeding,
and taking care of the young brood) whose young needing food in the nest, the cock and hen
continue mates, till the young are able to use their wing, and provide for themselves.
|
|
Sec. 80. And herein I think lies the chief, if not the only
reason, why the male and female in mankind are tied to a longer conjunction than other
creatures, viz. because the female is capable of conceiving, and de facto is commonly with
child again, and brings forth too a new birth, long before the former is out of a
dependency for support on his parents help, and able to shift for himself, and has all the
assistance is due to him from his parents: whereby the father, who is bound to take care
for those he hath begot, is under an obligation to continue in conjugal society with the
same woman longer than other creatures, whose young being able to subsist of themselves,
before the time of procreation returns again, the conjugal bond dissolves of itself, and
they are at liberty, till Hymen at his usual anniversary season summons them again to
chuse new mates. Wherein one cannot but admire the wisdom of the great Creator, who having
given to man foresight, and an ability to lay up for the future, as well as to supply the
present necessity, hath made it necessary, that society of man and wife should be more
lasting, than of male and female amongst other creatures; that so their industry might be
encouraged, and their interest better united, to make provision and lay up goods for their
common issue, which uncertain mixture, or easy and frequent solutions of conjugal society
would mightily disturb.
|
|
Sec. 81. But tho'these are ties upon mankind, which make the
conjugal bonds more firm and lasting in man, than the other species of animals; yet it
would give one reason to enquire, why this compact, where procreation and education are
secured, and inheritance taken care for, may not be made determinable, either by consent,
or at a certain time, or upon certain conditions, as well as any other voluntary compacts,
there being no necessity in the nature of the thing, nor to the ends of it, that it should
always be for life; I mean, to such as are under no restraint of any positive law, which
ordains all such contracts to be perpetual.
|
|
Sec. 82. But the husband and wife, though they have but one
common concern, yet having different understandings, will unavoidably sometimes have
different wills too; it therefore being necessary that the last determination, i. e. the
rule, should be placed somewhere; it naturally falls to the man's share, as the abler and
the stronger. But this reaching but to the things of their common interest and property,
leaves the wife in the full and free possession of what by contract is her peculiar right,
and gives the husband no more power over her life than she has over his; the power of the
husband being so far from that of an absolute monarch, that the wife has in many cases a
liberty to separate from him, where natural right, or their contract allows it; whether
that contract be made by themselves in the state of nature, or by the customs or laws of
the country they live in; and the children upon such separation fall to the father or
mother's lot, as such contract does determine.
|
|
Sec. 83. For all the ends of marriage being to be obtained
under politic government, as well as in the state of nature, the civil magistrate doth not
abridge the right or power of either naturally necessary to those ends, viz. procreation
and mutual support and assistance whilst they are together; but only decides any
controversy that may arise between man and wife about them. If it were otherwise, and that
absolute sovereignty and power of life and death naturally belonged to the husband, and
were necessary to the society between man and wife, there could be no matrimony in any of
those countries where the husband is allowed no such absolute authority. But the ends of
matrimony requiring no such power in the husband, the condition of conjugal society put it
not in him, it being not at all necessary to that state. Conjugal society could subsist
and attain its ends without it; nay, community of goods, and the power over them, mutual
assistance and maintenance, and other things belonging to conjugal society, might be
varied and regulated by that contract which unites man and wife in that society, as far as
may consist with procreation and the bringing up of children till they could shift for
themselves; nothing being necessary to any society, that is not necessary to the ends for
which it is made.
|
|
Sec. 84. The society betwixt parents and children, and the
distinct rights and powers belonging respectively to them, I have treated of so largely,
in the foregoing chapter, that I shall not here need to say any thing of it. And I think
it is plain, that it is far different from a politic society.
|
|
Sec. 85. Master and servant are names as old as history, but
given to those of far different condition; for a freeman makes himself a servant to
another, by selling him, for a certain time, the service he undertakes to do, in exchange
for wages he is to receive: and though this commonly puts him into the family of his
master, and under the ordinary discipline thereof; yet it gives the master but a temporary
power over him, and no greater than what is contained in the contract between them. But
there is another sort of servants, which by a peculiar name we call slaves, who being
captives taken in a just war, are by the right of nature subjected to the absolute
dominion and arbitrary power of their masters. These men having, as I say, forfeited their
lives, and with it their liberties, and lost their estates; and being in the state of
slavery, not capable of any property, cannot in that state be considered as any part of
civil society; the chief end whereof is the preservation of property.
|
|
Sec. 86. Let us therefore consider a master of a family with
all these subordinate relations of wife, children, servants, and slaves, united under the
domestic rule of a family; which, what resemblance soever it may have in its order,
offices, and number too, with a little common-wealth, yet is very far from it, both in its
constitution, power and end: or if it must be thought a monarchy, and the paterfamilias
the absolute monarch in it, absolute monarchy will have but a very shattered and short
power, when it is plain, by what has been said before, that the master of the family has a
very distinct and differently limited power, both as to time and extent, over those
several persons that are in it; for excepting the slave (and the family is as much a
family, and his power as paterfamilias as great, whether there be any slaves in his family
or no) he has no legislative power of life and death over any of them, and none too but
what a mistress of a family may have as well as he. And he certainly can have no absolute
power over the whole family, who has but a very limited one over every individual in it.
But how a family, or any other society of men, differ from that which is properly
political society, we shall best see, by considering wherein political society itself
consists.
|
|
Sec. 87. Man being born, as has been proved, with a title to
perfect freedom, and an uncontrouled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law
of nature, equally with any other man, or number of men in the world, hath by nature a
power, not only to preserve his property, that is, his life, liberty and estate, against
the injuries and attempts of other men; but to judge of, and punish the breaches of that
law in others, as he is persuaded the offence deserves, even with death itself, in crimes
where the heinousness of the fact, in his opinion, requires it. But because no political
society can be, nor subsist, without having in itself the power to preserve the property,
and in order thereunto, punish the offences of all those of that society; there, and there
only is political society, where every one of the members hath quitted this natural power,
resigned it up into the hands of the community in all cases that exclude him not from
appealing for protection to the law established by it. And thus all private judgment of
every particular member being excluded, the community comes to be umpire, by settled
standing rules, indifferent, and the same to all parties; and by men having authority from
the community, for the execution of those rules, decides all the differences that may
happen between any members of that society concerning any matter of right; and punishes
those offences which any member hath committed against the society, with such penalties as
the law has established: whereby it is easy to discern, who are, and who are not, in
political society together. Those who are united into one body, and have a common
established law and judicature to appeal to, with authority to decide controversies
between them, and punish offenders, are in civil society one with another: but those who
have no such common appeal, I mean on earth, are still in the state of nature, each being,
where there is no other, judge for himself, and executioner; which is, as I have before
shewed it, the perfect state of nature.
|
|
Sec. 88. And thus the common-wealth comes by a power to set
down what punishment shall belong to the several transgressions which they think worthy of
it, committed amongst the members of that society, (which is the power of making laws) as
well as it has the power to punish any injury done unto any of its members, by any one
that is not of it, (which is the power of war and peace;) and all this for the
preservation of the property of all the members of that society, as far as is possible.
But though every man who has entered into civil society, and is become a member of any
commonwealth, has thereby quitted his power to punish offences, against the law of nature,
in prosecution of his own private judgment, yet with the judgment of offences, which he
has given up to the legislative in all cases, where he can appeal to the magistrate, he
has given a right to the common-wealth to employ his force, for the execution of the
judgments of the common-wealth, whenever he shall be called to it; which indeed are his
own judgments, they being made by himself, or his representative. And herein we have the
original of the legislative and executive power of civil society, which is to judge by
standing laws, how far offences are to be punished, when committed within the
common-wealth; and also to determine, by occasional judgments founded on the present
circumstances of the fact, how far injuries from without are to be vindicated; and in both
these to employ all the force of all the members, when there shall be need.
|
|
Sec. 89. Where-ever therefore any number of men are so
united into one society, as to quit every one his executive power of the law of nature,
and to resign it to the public, there and there only is a political, or civil society. And
this is done, where-ever any number of men, in the state of nature, enter into society to
make one people, one body politic, under one supreme government; or else when any one
joins himself to, and incorporates with any government already made: for hereby he
authorizes the society, or which is all one, the legislative thereof, to make laws for
him, as the public good of the society shall require; to the execution whereof, his own
assistance (as to his own decrees) is due. And this puts men out of a state of nature into
that of a common-wealth, by setting up a judge on earth, with authority to determine all
the controversies, and redress the injuries that may happen to any member of the
commonwealth; which judge is the legislative, or magistrates appointed by it. And
where-ever there are any number of men, however associated, that have no such decisive
power to appeal to, there they are still in the state of nature.
|
|
Sec. 90. Hence it is evident, that absolute monarchy, which
by some men is counted the only government in the world, is indeed inconsistent with civil
society, and so can be no form of civil-government at all: for the end of civil society,
being to avoid, and remedy those inconveniencies of the state of nature, which necessarily
follow from every man's being judge in his own case, by setting up a known authority, to
which every one of that society may appeal upon any injury received, or controversy that
may arise, and which every one of the* society ought to obey; where-ever any persons are,
who have not such an authority to appeal to, for the decision of any difference between
them, there those persons are still in the state of nature; and so is every absolute
prince, in respect of those who are under his dominion.
|
|
(* The public power of all society is above every soul
contained in the same society; and the principal use of that power is, to give laws unto
all that are under it, which laws in such cases we must obey, unless there be reason
shewed which may necessarily inforce, that the law of reason, or of God, doth enjoin the
contrary, Hook. Eccl. Pol. l. i. sect. 16.)
|
|
Sec. 91. For he being supposed to have all, both legislative
and executive power in himself alone, there is no judge to be found, no appeal lies open
to any one, who may fairly, and indifferently, and with authority decide, and from whose
decision relief and redress may be expected of any injury or inconviency, that may be
suffered from the prince, or by his order: so that such a man, however intitled, Czar, or
Grand Seignior, or how you please, is as much in the state of nature, with all under his
dominion, as he is with therest of mankind: for where-ever any two men are, who have no
standing rule, and common judge to appeal to on earth, for the determination of
controversies of right betwixt them, there they are still in the state of* nature, and
under all the inconveniencies of it, with only this woful difference to the subject, or
rather slave of an absolute prince: that whereas, in the ordinary state of nature, he has
a liberty to judge of his right, and according to the best of his power, to maintain it;
now, whenever his property is invaded by the will and order of his monarch, he has not
only no appeal, as those in society ought to have, but as if he were degraded from the
common state of rational creatures, is denied a liberty to judge of, or to defend his
right; and so is exposed to all the misery and inconveniencies, that a man can fear from
one, who being in the unrestrained state of nature, is yet corrupted with flattery, and
armed with power.
|
|
(* To take away all such mutual grievances, injuries and
wrongs, i.e. such as attend men in the state of nature, there was no way but only by
growing into composition and agreement amongst themselves, by ordaining some kind of
govemment public, and by yielding themselves subject thereunto, that unto whom they
granted authority to rule and govem, by them the peace, tranquillity and happy estate of
the rest might be procured. Men always knew that where force and injury was offered, they
might be defenders of themselves; they knew that however men may seek their own commodity,
yet if this were done with injury unto others, it was not to be suffered, but by all men,
and all good means to be withstood. Finally, they knew that no man might in reason take
upon him to determine his own right, and according to his own determination proceed in
maintenance thereof, in as much as every man is towards himself, and them whom he greatly
affects, partial; and therefore that strifes and troubles would be endless, except they
gave their common consent, all to be ordered by some, whom they should agree upon, without
which consent there would be no reason that one man should take upon him to be lord or
judge over another, Hooker's Eccl. Pol. l. i. sect. 10.)
|
|
Sec. 92. For he that thinks absolute power purifies men's
blood, and corrects the baseness of human nature, need read but the history of this, or
any other age, to be convinced of the contrary. He that would have been insolent and
injurious in the woods of America, would not probably be much better in a throne; where
perhaps learning and religion shall be found out to justify all that he shall do to his
subjects, and the sword presently silence all those that dare question it: for what the
protection of absolute monarchy is, what kind of fathers of their countries it makes
princes to be and to what a degree of happiness and security it carries civil society,
where this sort of government is grown to perfection, he that will look into the late
relation of Ceylon, may easily see.
|
|
Sec. 93. In absolute monarchies indeed, as well as other
governments of the world, the subjects have an appeal to the law, and judges to decide any
controversies, and restrain any violence that may happen betwixt the subjects themselves,
one amongst another. This every one thinks necessary, and believes he deserves to be
thought a declared enemy to society and mankind, who should go about to take it away. But
whether this be from a true love of mankind and society, and such a charity as we owe all
one to another, there is reason to doubt: for this is no more than what every man, who
loves his own power, profit, or greatness, may and naturally must do, keep those animals
from hurting, or destroying one another, who labour and drudge only for his pleasure and
advantage; and so are taken care of, not out of any love the master has for them, but love
of himself, and the profit they bring him: for if it be asked, what security, what fence
is there, in such a state, against the violence and oppression of this absolute ruler? the
very question can scarce be borne. They are ready to tell you, that it deserves death only
to ask after safety. Betwixt subject and subject, they will grant, there must be measures,
laws and judges, for their mutual peace and security: but as for the ruler, he ought to be
absolute, and is above all such circumstances; because he has power to do more hurt and
wrong, it is right when he does it. To ask how you may be guarded from harm, or injury, on
that side where the strongest hand is to do it, is presently the voice of faction and
rebellion: as if when men quitting the state of nature entered into society, they agreed
that all of them but one, should be under the restraint of laws, but that he should still
retain all the liberty of the state of nature, increased with power, and made licentious
by impunity. This is to think, that men are so foolish, that they take care to avoid what
mischiefs may be done them by pole-cats, or foxes; but are content, nay, think it safety,
to be devoured by lions.
|
|
Sec. 94. But whatever flatterers may talk to amuse people's
understandings, it hinders not men from feeling; and when they perceive, that any man, in
what station soever, is out of the bounds of the civil society which they are of, and that
they have no appeal on earth against any harm, they may receive from him, they are apt to
think themselves in the state of nature, in respect of him whom they find to be so; and to
take care, as soon as they can, to have that safety and security in civil society, for
which it was first instituted, and for which only they entered into it. And therefore,
though perhaps at first , (as shall be shewed more at large hereafter in the following
part of this discourse) some one good and excellent man having got a pre -eminency amongst
the rest, had this deference paid to his goodness and virtue, as to a kind of natural
authority, that the chief rule, with arbitration of their differences, by a tacit consent
devolved into his hands, without any other caution, but the assurance they had of his
uprightness and wisdom; yet when time, giving authority, and (as some men would persuade
us) sacredness of customs, which the negligent, and unforeseeing innocence of the first
ages began, had brought in successors of another stamp, the people finding their
properties not secure under the government, as then it was, (whereas government has no
other end but the preservation of * property) could never be safe nor at rest, nor think
themselves in civil society, till the legislature was placed in collective bodies of men,
call them senate, parliament, or what you please. By which means every single person
became subject, equally with other the meanest men, to those laws, which he himself, as
part of the legislative, had established; nor could any one, by his own authority; avoid
the force of the law, when once made; nor by any pretence of superiority plead exemption,
thereby to license his own, or the miscarriages of any of his dependents.** No man in
civil society can be exempted from the laws of it: for if any man may do what he thinks
fit, and there be no appeal on earth, for redress or security against any harm he shall
do; I ask, whether he be not perfectly still in the state of nature, and so can be no part
or member of that civil society; unless any one will say, the state of nature and civil
society are one and the same thing, which I have never yet found any one so great a patron
of anarchy as to affirm.
|
|
(* At the first, when some certain kind of regiment was once
appointed, it may be that nothing was then farther thought upon for the manner of
goveming, but all permitted unto their wisdom and discretion, which were to rule, till by
experience they found this for all parts very inconvenient, so as the thing which they had
devised for a remedy, did indeed but increase the sore, which it should have cured. They
saw, that to live by one man's will, became the cause of all men's misery. This
constrained them to come unto laws, wherein all men might see their duty beforehand, and
know the penalties of transgressing them. Hooker's Eccl. Pol. l. i. sect. 10.)
|
|
(** Civil law being the act of the whole body politic, doth
therefore over-rule each several part of the same body. Hooker, ibid.)
|
|
|
|